Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd

Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd

Hashrate 580.0 TH/s Power 5,510 W Efficiency 9.5 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

Hashrate 262.0 TH/s Power 3,799 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
580.0 TH/s Hashrate 262.0 TH/s
5,510 W Power Consumption 3,799 W
9.5 J/TH Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
13.5 kg Weight 25.5 kg
18,800 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,962 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd

Daily Revenue 0.00026691 BTC $21.12
Daily Electricity -$13.22
Daily Profit $7.89
Monthly $236.77
Yearly $2,880.68

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

Daily Revenue 0.00012057 BTC $9.54
Daily Electricity -$9.12
Daily Profit $0.42
Monthly $12.63
Yearly $153.71

Based on BTC price of $79,115 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 121% more hashrate (580 vs 262 TH/s). The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 121% more hashrate (580 vs 262 TH/s)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 31% better power draw (5,510 vs 3,799 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 34% better efficiency (9.5 vs 14.5 J/TH)
  • Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 47% better weight (13.5 vs 25.5 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 45% more heat output (18,800 vs 12,962 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd Metric MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
$12,995 Upfront cost (MSRP)
$7.89 Daily net profit $0.42
-$10,114 Net after 1 year +$154
-$7,234 Net after 2 years +$307
-$4,353 Net after 3 years +$461
Takes ~4.5 years to pay back at current rates Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd

$7.47/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd

9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd is more profitable at $7.89/day compared to $0.42/day for the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd runs at 9.5 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 5.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficiency (9.5 vs 14.5 J/TH).