Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 33.0 TH/s |
| 1,127 W | Power Consumption | 2,145 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 65.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 8,550.0 kg |
| 3,845 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,319 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th)
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Based on BTC price of $79,126 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 wins on 2 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 187% more hashrate (11.5 vs 33.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 187% more hashrate (11.5 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) 47% better power draw (1,127 vs 2,145 W)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 34% better efficiency (98.0 vs 65.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) 51% better weight (4,200 vs 8,550 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 90% more heat output (3,845 vs 7,319 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) 19% more home mining score (31.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$2.29 | Daily net profit | -$3.95 |
| -$899 | Net after 1 year | -$3,940 |
| -$1,734 | Net after 2 years | -$5,381 |
| -$2,568 | Net after 3 years | -$6,821 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT Whatsminer M1065.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.29/day compared to $-3.95/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) or MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 33.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficiency (98.0 vs 65.0 J/TH).