Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Specification | Antminer Slim Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| 13.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 1,100 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 91.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 3.5 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,753 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 15% better power draw (1,300 vs 1,100 W). The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Antminer Slim Edition (S9) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 8% more hashrate (13.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 15% better power draw (1,300 vs 1,100 W)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 8% better efficiency (100.0 vs 91.7 J/TH)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 3.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 18% more heat output (4,436 vs 3,753 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 68% more home mining score (31.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Metric | Antminer Slim Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $350 |
| -$2.65 | Daily net profit | -$2.20 |
| -$1,031 | Net after 1 year | -$1,154 |
| -$1,997 | Net after 2 years | -$1,959 |
| -$2,964 | Net after 3 years | -$2,763 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)91.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.20/day compared to $-2.65/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or Antminer Slim Edition (S9)?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Antminer Slim Edition (S9)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) runs at 100.0 J/TH while the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH — a difference of 8.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficiency (100.0 vs 91.7 J/TH).