Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 13.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 1,400 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 350.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 0.7 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,777 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 71% better efficiency (100 vs 350 J/TH). The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Canaan Avalon Nano 3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 225% more hashrate (13.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 7% better power draw (1,300 vs 1,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 71% better efficiency (100 vs 350 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 0.7 kg)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 8% more heat output (4,436 vs 4,777 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 113% more home mining score (31.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $149 |
| -$2.65 | Daily net profit | -$3.21 |
| -$1,031 | Net after 1 year | -$1,322 |
| -$1,997 | Net after 2 years | -$2,496 |
| -$2,964 | Net after 3 years | -$3,669 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3Score: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)100.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or Canaan Avalon Nano 3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-3.21/day for the Canaan Avalon Nano 3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Canaan Avalon Nano 3 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) runs at 100.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 runs at 350.0 J/TH — a difference of 250.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficiency (100 vs 350 J/TH).