Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Avalon A1446
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Specification | Avalon A1446 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 135.0 TH/s |
| 1,280 W | Power Consumption | 3,310 W |
| 80.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 24.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,560.0 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 4,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,294 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Avalon A1446
Based on BTC price of $79,210 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1446 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 744% more hashrate (16.0 vs 135.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1446's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Avalon A1446 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1446 744% more hashrate (16.0 vs 135.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 61% better power draw (1,280 vs 3,310 W)
- Avalon A1446 69% better efficiency (80.0 vs 24.5 J/TH)
- Avalon A1446 100% better weight (4,560.0 vs 12.8 kg)
- Avalon A1446 159% more heat output (4,367 vs 11,294 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1446 16% more home mining score (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Metric | Avalon A1446 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$2.47 | Daily net profit | -$2.87 |
| -$902 | Net after 1 year | -$4,247 |
| -$1,804 | Net after 2 years | -$5,295 |
| -$2,705 | Net after 3 years | -$6,342 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1446Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A144624.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Avalon A1446 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.47/day compared to $-2.87/day for the Avalon A1446. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or the Avalon A1446 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Avalon A1446 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Avalon A1446: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1446 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Avalon A1446 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH — a difference of 55.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficiency (80.0 vs 24.5 J/TH).