Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 68.0 TH/s |
| 1,280 W | Power Consumption | 3,420 W |
| 80.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 50.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,560.0 kg | Weight | 11,200.0 kg |
| 4,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,669 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro
Based on BTC price of $79,423 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 325% more hashrate (16.0 vs 68.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro 325% more hashrate (16.0 vs 68.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 63% better power draw (1,280 vs 3,420 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro 37% better efficiency (80.0 vs 50.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 59% better weight (4,560 vs 11,200 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro 167% more heat output (4,367 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $519 |
| -$2.49 | Daily net profit | -$5.72 |
| -$908 | Net after 1 year | -$2,608 |
| -$1,816 | Net after 2 years | -$4,697 |
| -$2,723 | Net after 3 years | -$6,785 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro50.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.49/day compared to $-5.72/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro runs at 50.3 J/TH — a difference of 29.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 37% better efficiency (80.0 vs 50.3 J/TH).