Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 1,280 W Efficiency 80.0 J/TH
VS
MicroBT Whatsminer M21

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Hashrate 31.0 TH/s Power 1,860 W Efficiency 60.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) Specification MicroBT Whatsminer M21
16.0 TH/s Hashrate 31.0 TH/s
1,280 W Power Consumption 1,860 W
80.0 J/TH Efficiency 60.0 J/TH
Noise Level
4,560.0 kg Weight 7,150.0 kg
4,367 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,346 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$3.07
Daily Profit -$2.49
Monthly -$74.68
Yearly -$908.67

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Daily Revenue 0.00001427 BTC $1.13
Daily Electricity -$4.46
Daily Profit -$3.34
Monthly -$100.06
Yearly -$1,217.42

Based on BTC price of $79,113 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT Whatsminer M21, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 94% more hashrate (16.0 vs 31.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: MicroBT Whatsminer M21 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M21 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • MicroBT Whatsminer M21 94% more hashrate (16.0 vs 31.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 31% better power draw (1,280 vs 1,860 W)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M21 25% better efficiency (80.0 vs 60.0 J/TH)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 36% better weight (4,560 vs 7,150 kg)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M21 45% more heat output (4,367 vs 6,346 BTU/hr)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 11% more home mining score (31.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

60.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or MicroBT Whatsminer M21 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.49/day compared to $-3.34/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M21. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or the MicroBT Whatsminer M21?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M21). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M21 runs at 60.0 J/TH — a difference of 20.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficiency (80.0 vs 60.0 J/TH).