Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3S |
|---|---|---|
| 13.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 1,310 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| 97.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 30 dB |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 0.9 kg |
| 4,470 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 478 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Based on BTC price of $79,088 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 89% better power draw (1,310 vs 140 W). The Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) and Canaan Avalon Nano 3S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) 125% more hashrate (13.5 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 89% better power draw (1,310 vs 140 W)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 76% better efficiency (97.0 vs 23.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 0.9 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) 836% more heat output (4,470 vs 478 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 110% more home mining score (31.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3S |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $145 |
| -$2.65 | Daily net profit | -$0.12 |
| -$1,568 | Net after 1 year | -$188 |
| -$2,536 | Net after 2 years | -$231 |
| -$3,505 | Net after 3 years | -$274 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3SScore: 65/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S23.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-2.65/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) or Canaan Avalon Nano 3S?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) and Canaan Avalon Nano 3S on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) runs at 97.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S runs at 23.3 J/TH — a difference of 73.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficiency (97.0 vs 23.3 J/TH).