Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 88.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.0 TH/s |
| 3,344 W | Power Consumption | 1,400 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 350.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 0.7 kg |
| 11,410 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,777 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 2100% more hashrate (88.0 vs 4.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)'s favour. The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) and Canaan Avalon Nano 3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 2100% more hashrate (88.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 58% better power draw (3,344 vs 1,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 89% better efficiency (38.0 vs 350.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 0.7 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 139% more heat output (11,410 vs 4,777 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 200% more home mining score (22.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| $596 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $149 |
| -$4.83 | Daily net profit | -$3.21 |
| -$2,357 | Net after 1 year | -$1,322 |
| -$4,118 | Net after 2 years | -$2,496 |
| -$5,879 | Net after 3 years | -$3,669 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3Score: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)38.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or the Canaan Avalon Nano 3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is more profitable at $-3.21/day compared to $-4.83/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 runs at 350.0 J/TH — a difference of 312.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 89% better efficiency (38.0 vs 350.0 J/TH).