Avalon A1346 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3X
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1346 | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M3X |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.5 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 2,050 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 164.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,995 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1346
MicroBT Whatsminer M3X
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1346 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 780% more hashrate (110.0 vs 12.5 TH/s) in the Avalon A1346's favour. The MicroBT Whatsminer M3X claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1346 and MicroBT Whatsminer M3X diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1346 780% more hashrate (110.0 vs 12.5 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3X 38% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,050 W)
- Avalon A1346 82% better efficiency (30.0 vs 164.0 J/TH)
- Avalon A1346 100% better weight (12.3 vs 7,500.0 kg)
- Avalon A1346 61% more heat output (11,260 vs 6,995 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1346 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1346 | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M3X |
|---|---|---|
| $2,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $350 |
| -$3.96 | Daily net profit | -$4.47 |
| -$4,246 | Net after 1 year | -$1,982 |
| -$5,693 | Net after 2 years | -$3,613 |
| -$7,139 | Net after 3 years | -$5,245 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1346Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A134630.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1346 or MicroBT Whatsminer M3X more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1346 is more profitable at $-3.96/day compared to $-4.47/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1346 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Avalon A1346 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1346 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X?
The Avalon A1346 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1346 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3X: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X runs at 164.0 J/TH — a difference of 134.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (30.0 vs 164.0 J/TH).