Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1366

Avalon A1366

Hashrate 130.0 TH/s Power 3,250 W Efficiency 25.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M30S++

Whatsminer M30S++

Hashrate 112.0 TH/s Power 3,472 W Efficiency 31.0 J/TH

Avalon A1366 vs Whatsminer M30S++

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1366 Specification Whatsminer M30S++
130.0 TH/s Hashrate 112.0 TH/s
3,250 W Power Consumption 3,472 W
25.0 J/TH Efficiency 31.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
12.6 kg Weight 12.0 kg
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,847 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1366

Daily Revenue 0.00005982 BTC $4.74
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$3.06
Monthly -$91.85
Yearly -$1,117.48

Whatsminer M30S++

Daily Revenue 0.00005154 BTC $4.08
Daily Electricity -$8.33
Daily Profit -$4.25
Monthly -$127.51
Yearly -$1,551.43

Based on BTC price of $79,206 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1366 edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). The standout gap is 19% better efficiency (25.0 vs 31.0 J/TH) in the Avalon A1366's favour. That said, the Whatsminer M30S++ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1366 — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1366 and Whatsminer M30S++ sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1366 16% more hashrate (130 vs 112 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1366 6% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,472 W)
  • Avalon A1366 19% better efficiency (25.0 vs 31.0 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M30S++ 5% better weight (12.6 vs 12.0 kg)
  • Whatsminer M30S++ 7% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,847 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1366 Metric Whatsminer M30S++
$3,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $2,300
-$3.06 Daily net profit -$4.25
-$4,617 Net after 1 year -$3,851
-$5,735 Net after 2 years -$5,403
-$6,852 Net after 3 years -$6,954
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1366

25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Avalon A1366 or Whatsminer M30S++ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1366 is more profitable at $-3.06/day compared to $-4.25/day for the Whatsminer M30S++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1366 vs Whatsminer M30S++: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Avalon A1366 vs Whatsminer M30S++: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Avalon A1366 and Whatsminer M30S++ on J/TH?

The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S++ runs at 31.0 J/TH — a difference of 6.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 19% better efficiency (25.0 vs 31.0 J/TH).