Avalon A1466 vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1466 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U |
|---|---|---|
| 150.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 480.0 TH/s |
| 3,230 W | Power Consumption | 8,046 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 16.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 20.0 kg |
| 11,021 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 27,453 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 23/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1466
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U
Based on BTC price of $79,113 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 220% more hashrate (150 vs 480 TH/s). The Avalon A1466 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1466 and Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 220% more hashrate (150 vs 480 TH/s)
- Avalon A1466 60% better power draw (3,230 vs 8,046 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 22% better efficiency (21.5 vs 16.8 J/TH)
- Avalon A1466 6% better noise (75.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Avalon A1466 36% better weight (12.8 vs 20.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 149% more heat output (11,021 vs 27,453 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1466 57% more home mining score (36.0 vs 23.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1466 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U |
|---|---|---|
| $4,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,568 |
| -$2.29 | Daily net profit | -$1.84 |
| -$5,036 | Net after 1 year | -$6,238 |
| -$5,872 | Net after 2 years | -$6,908 |
| -$6,709 | Net after 3 years | -$7,578 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1466Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1466 or Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U is more profitable at $-1.84/day compared to $-2.29/day for the Avalon A1466. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Avalon A1466 vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Avalon A1466 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1466 or Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U?
The Avalon A1466 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 23/100 for the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1466 vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U runs at 16.8 J/TH — a difference of 4.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 22% better efficiency (21.5 vs 16.8 J/TH).