Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1366 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 480.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Power Consumption | 8,046 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 16.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 12.6 kg | Weight | 20.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 27,453 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 23/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1366
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U
Based on BTC price of $79,097 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 269% more hashrate (130 vs 480 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U's favour. The Avalon A1366 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 269% more hashrate (130 vs 480 TH/s)
- Avalon A1366 60% better power draw (3,250 vs 8,046 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 33% better efficiency (25.0 vs 16.8 J/TH)
- Avalon A1366 6% better noise (75.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Avalon A1366 37% better weight (12.6 vs 20.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 148% more heat output (11,089 vs 27,453 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1366 57% more home mining score (36.0 vs 23.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1366 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,568 |
| -$3.07 | Daily net profit | -$1.84 |
| -$4,620 | Net after 1 year | -$6,239 |
| -$5,740 | Net after 2 years | -$6,910 |
| -$6,860 | Net after 3 years | -$7,582 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1366Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U is more profitable at $-1.84/day compared to $-3.07/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Avalon A1366 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1366 or the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U?
The Avalon A1366 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 23/100 for the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U?
The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U runs at 16.8 J/TH — a difference of 8.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficiency (25.0 vs 16.8 J/TH).