Avalon A1466 vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1466 | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 150.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,230 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 11,021 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1466
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Avalon A1466 wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1775% more hashrate (150.0 vs 8.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1466's favour. The NerdOctaxe Gamma claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Avalon A1466 and NerdOctaxe Gamma actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Avalon A1466 1775% more hashrate (150.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 94% better power draw (3,230 vs 200 W)
- Avalon A1466 14% better efficiency (21.5 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 94% better weight (12.8 vs 0.8 kg)
- Avalon A1466 1515% more heat output (11,021 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 69% more home mining score (36.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1466 | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $4,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$2.30 | Daily net profit | -$0.19 |
| -$5,038 | Net after 1 year | -$668 |
| -$5,877 | Net after 2 years | -$737 |
| -$6,715 | Net after 3 years | -$806 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1466 or the NerdOctaxe Gamma?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.19/day compared to $-2.30/day for the Avalon A1466. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1466 or the NerdOctaxe Gamma better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Avalon A1466 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Avalon A1466 vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which fits a residential setup better?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1466). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Avalon A1466 and NerdOctaxe Gamma on J/TH?
The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 3.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficiency (21.5 vs 25.0 J/TH).