Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the NerdOctaxe Gamma comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 85% better power draw (1,350 vs 200 W) in the NerdOctaxe Gamma's favour. That said, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and NerdOctaxe Gamma diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 75% more hashrate (14.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 85% better power draw (1,350 vs 200 W)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 74% better efficiency (96.4 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 18% better noise (55.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 87% better weight (6.0 vs 0.8 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 575% more heat output (4,606 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 3% more home mining score (59.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$0.19 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$669 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$739 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$809 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdOctaxe Gamma25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or NerdOctaxe Gamma more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.19/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which fits a residential setup better?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 71.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficiency (96.4 vs 25.0 J/TH).