Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1466

Avalon A1466

Hashrate 150.0 TH/s Power 3,230 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
VS
FluMiner T3

FluMiner T3

Hashrate 115.0 TH/s Power 1,700 W Efficiency 14.8 J/TH

Avalon A1466 vs FluMiner T3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1466 Specification FluMiner T3
150.0 TH/s Hashrate 115.0 TH/s
3,230 W Power Consumption 1,700 W
21.5 J/TH Efficiency 14.8 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 50 dB
12.8 kg Weight 12.6 kg
11,021 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,800 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 56/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer FluMiner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1466

Daily Revenue 0.00006903 BTC $5.46
Daily Electricity -$7.75
Daily Profit -$2.29
Monthly -$68.78
Yearly -$836.86

FluMiner T3

Daily Revenue 0.00005292 BTC $4.19
Daily Electricity -$4.08
Daily Profit $0.11
Monthly $3.16
Yearly $38.48

Based on BTC price of $79,088 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the FluMiner T3 comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 47% better power draw (3,230 vs 1,700 W). The Avalon A1466 holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: FluMiner T3 — wins on 5 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1466 and FluMiner T3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Avalon A1466 30% more hashrate (150 vs 115 TH/s)
  • FluMiner T3 47% better power draw (3,230 vs 1,700 W)
  • FluMiner T3 31% better efficiency (21.5 vs 14.8 J/TH)
  • FluMiner T3 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
  • FluMiner T3 2% better weight (12.8 vs 12.6 kg)
  • Avalon A1466 90% more heat output (11,021 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
  • FluMiner T3 56% more home mining score (36.0 vs 56.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1466 Metric FluMiner T3
$4,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,601
-$2.29 Daily net profit $0.11
-$5,037 Net after 1 year -$1,562
-$5,874 Net after 2 years -$1,524
-$6,711 Net after 3 years -$1,485
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Takes ~41.6 years to pay back at current rates

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

FluMiner T3

$2.40/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

FluMiner T3

Score: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

FluMiner T3

14.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1466 vs FluMiner T3: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner T3 is more profitable at $0.11/day compared to $-2.29/day for the Avalon A1466. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1466 or FluMiner T3?

The FluMiner T3 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Avalon A1466 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1466 or the FluMiner T3?

The FluMiner T3 scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1466). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1466 and FluMiner T3?

The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the FluMiner T3 runs at 14.8 J/TH — a difference of 6.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficiency (21.5 vs 14.8 J/TH).