Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Hashrate 185.0 TH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Hashrate 115.0 TH/s Power 3,500 W Efficiency 30.4 J/TH

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1566 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
185.0 TH/s Hashrate 115.0 TH/s
3,420 W Power Consumption 3,500 W
18.5 J/TH Efficiency 30.4 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.9 kg Weight 13.0 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,942 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008779 BTC $6.92
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$1.28
Monthly -$38.49
Yearly -$468.30

Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Daily Revenue 0.00005457 BTC $4.30
Daily Electricity -$8.40
Daily Profit -$4.10
Monthly -$122.86
Yearly -$1,494.78

Based on BTC price of $78,880 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1566, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). The standout gap is 39% better efficiency (18.5 vs 30.4 J/TH) in the Avalon A1566's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 holds the edge in price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1566 — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1566 and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Avalon A1566 61% more hashrate (185 vs 115 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1566 2% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,500 W)
  • Avalon A1566 39% better efficiency (18.5 vs 30.4 J/TH)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 13% better weight (14.9 vs 13.0 kg)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 2% more heat output (11,669 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Avalon A1566 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
$5,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $609
-$1.28 Daily net profit -$4.10
-$5,968 Net after 1 year -$2,104
-$6,437 Net after 2 years -$3,599
-$6,905 Net after 3 years -$5,093
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1566

18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1566 is more profitable at $-1.28/day compared to $-4.10/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1566 and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?

The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 runs at 30.4 J/TH — a difference of 11.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficiency (18.5 vs 30.4 J/TH).