Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1466

Avalon A1466

Hashrate 150.0 TH/s Power 3,230 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Hashrate 115.0 TH/s Power 3,500 W Efficiency 30.4 J/TH

Avalon A1466 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1466 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
150.0 TH/s Hashrate 115.0 TH/s
3,230 W Power Consumption 3,500 W
21.5 J/TH Efficiency 30.4 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
12.8 kg Weight 13.0 kg
11,021 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,942 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1466

Daily Revenue 0.00007118 BTC $5.61
Daily Electricity -$7.75
Daily Profit -$2.14
Monthly -$64.11
Yearly -$780.06

Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Daily Revenue 0.00005457 BTC $4.30
Daily Electricity -$8.40
Daily Profit -$4.10
Monthly -$122.86
Yearly -$1,494.78

Based on BTC price of $78,880 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Avalon A1466 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Its biggest concrete edge: 29% better efficiency (21.5 vs 30.4 J/TH). The Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 holds the edge in price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1466 — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1466 and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Avalon A1466 30% more hashrate (150 vs 115 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1466 8% better power draw (3,230 vs 3,500 W)
  • Avalon A1466 29% better efficiency (21.5 vs 30.4 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1466 2% better weight (12.8 vs 13.0 kg)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 8% more heat output (11,021 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1466 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
$4,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $609
-$2.14 Daily net profit -$4.10
-$4,980 Net after 1 year -$2,104
-$5,760 Net after 2 years -$3,599
-$6,540 Net after 3 years -$5,093
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1466

21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1466 or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1466 is more profitable at $-2.14/day compared to $-4.10/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Avalon A1466 or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1466 or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1466 and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?

The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 runs at 30.4 J/TH — a difference of 8.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 29% better efficiency (21.5 vs 30.4 J/TH).