Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1366

Avalon A1366

Hashrate 130.0 TH/s Power 3,250 W Efficiency 25.0 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Hashrate 115.0 TH/s Power 3,500 W Efficiency 30.4 J/TH

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1366 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
130.0 TH/s Hashrate 115.0 TH/s
3,250 W Power Consumption 3,500 W
25.0 J/TH Efficiency 30.4 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
12.6 kg Weight 13.0 kg
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,942 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1366

Daily Revenue 0.00006169 BTC $4.87
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$2.93
Monthly -$88.01
Yearly -$1,070.84

Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Daily Revenue 0.00005457 BTC $4.30
Daily Electricity -$8.40
Daily Profit -$4.10
Monthly -$122.86
Yearly -$1,494.78

Based on BTC price of $78,880 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1366, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 18% better efficiency (25.0 vs 30.4 J/TH). That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Avalon A1366 — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1366 and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Avalon A1366 13% more hashrate (130 vs 115 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1366 7% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,500 W)
  • Avalon A1366 18% better efficiency (25.0 vs 30.4 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1366 3% better weight (12.6 vs 13.0 kg)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 8% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Avalon A1366 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
$3,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $609
-$2.93 Daily net profit -$4.10
-$4,571 Net after 1 year -$2,104
-$5,642 Net after 2 years -$3,599
-$6,713 Net after 3 years -$5,093
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1366

25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Avalon A1366 or Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1366 is more profitable at $-2.93/day compared to $-4.10/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Avalon A1366 or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1366 or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 runs at 30.4 J/TH — a difference of 5.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 18% better efficiency (25.0 vs 30.4 J/TH).