Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1346

Avalon A1346

Hashrate 110.0 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Hashrate 115.0 TH/s Power 3,500 W Efficiency 30.4 J/TH

Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1346 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
110.0 TH/s Hashrate 115.0 TH/s
3,300 W Power Consumption 3,500 W
30.0 J/TH Efficiency 30.4 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
12.3 kg Weight 13.0 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,942 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1346

Daily Revenue 0.00005220 BTC $4.12
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$3.80
Monthly -$114.07
Yearly -$1,387.89

Canaan AvalonMiner A1326

Daily Revenue 0.00005457 BTC $4.30
Daily Electricity -$8.40
Daily Profit -$4.10
Monthly -$122.86
Yearly -$1,494.78

Based on BTC price of $78,880 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1346 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption). The standout gap is 6% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,500 W) in the Avalon A1346's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Avalon A1346 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1346 and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 5% more hashrate (110 vs 115 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1346 6% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,500 W)
  • Avalon A1346 1% better efficiency (30.0 vs 30.4 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1346 5% better weight (12.3 vs 13.0 kg)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 6% more heat output (11,260 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1346 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
$2,800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $609
-$3.80 Daily net profit -$4.10
-$4,188 Net after 1 year -$2,104
-$5,576 Net after 2 years -$3,599
-$6,964 Net after 3 years -$5,093
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1346

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1346 is more profitable at $-3.80/day compared to $-4.10/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 runs at 30.4 J/TH — a difference of 0.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficiency (30.0 vs 30.4 J/TH).