Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Hashrate 185.0 TH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Hashrate 57.0 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 57.9 J/TH

Avalon A1566 vs Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1566 Specification Innosilicon T3+ 57T
185.0 TH/s Hashrate 57.0 TH/s
3,420 W Power Consumption 3,300 W
18.5 J/TH Efficiency 57.9 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
14.9 kg Weight 10,380.0 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008513 BTC $6.73
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$1.48
Monthly -$44.42
Yearly -$540.40

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Daily Revenue 0.00002623 BTC $2.07
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$5.85
Monthly -$175.42
Yearly -$2,134.23

Based on BTC price of $79,022 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Avalon A1566 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 225% more hashrate (185.0 vs 57.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1566's favour. The Innosilicon T3+ 57T holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1566 — wins on 4 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1566 and Innosilicon T3+ 57T sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1566 225% more hashrate (185.0 vs 57.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 57T 4% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,300 W)
  • Avalon A1566 68% better efficiency (18.5 vs 57.9 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1566 100% better weight (14.9 vs 10,380.0 kg)
  • Avalon A1566 4% more heat output (11,669 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1566 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1566 Metric Innosilicon T3+ 57T
$5,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $550
-$1.48 Daily net profit -$5.85
-$6,040 Net after 1 year -$2,684
-$6,581 Net after 2 years -$4,818
-$7,121 Net after 3 years -$6,953
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1566

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1566

18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1566 or the Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1566 is more profitable at $-1.48/day compared to $-5.85/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 57T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1566 or Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

The Avalon A1566 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 57T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1566 or the Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

The Avalon A1566 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 57T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Avalon A1566 vs Innosilicon T3+ 57T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 57T runs at 57.9 J/TH — a difference of 39.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficiency (18.5 vs 57.9 J/TH).