Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Hashrate 2,000.0 MH/s Power 2,500 W Efficiency 1,250,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Hashrate 57.0 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 57.9 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro Specification Innosilicon T3+ 57T
2,000.0 MH/s Hashrate 57.0 TH/s
2,500 W Power Consumption 3,300 W
1,250,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 57.9 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
22.0 kg Weight 10,380.0 kg
8,530 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
40/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.00
Daily Profit -$6.00
Monthly -$180.00
Yearly -$2,189.97

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Daily Revenue 0.00002623 BTC $2.07
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$5.85
Monthly -$175.41
Yearly -$2,134.17

Based on BTC price of $79,029 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Innosilicon T3+ 57T wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 2849900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 57.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon A11 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Innosilicon T3+ 57T — wins on 3 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A11 Pro and Innosilicon T3+ 57T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon T3+ 57T 2849900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 57.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro 24% better power draw (2,500 vs 3,300 W)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 57T 100% better efficiency (1,250,000.0 vs 57.9 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro 100% better weight (22.0 vs 10,380.0 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 57T 32% more heat output (8,530 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro 82% more home mining score (40.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A11 Pro Metric Innosilicon T3+ 57T
$4,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $550
-$6.00 Daily net profit -$5.85
-$6,190 Net after 1 year -$2,684
-$8,380 Net after 2 years -$4,818
-$10,570 Net after 3 years -$6,953
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

57.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro or Innosilicon T3+ 57T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon T3+ 57T is more profitable at $-5.85/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro or the Innosilicon T3+ 57T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 57T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A11 Pro or the Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 57T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro and Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro runs at 1,250,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 57T runs at 57.9 J/TH — a difference of 1,249,942.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,250,000.0 vs 57.9 J/TH).