Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Hashrate 215.0 TH/s Power 3,612 W Efficiency 16.8 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

Hashrate 920.0 TH/s Power 13,340 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M79
215.0 TH/s Hashrate 920.0 TH/s
3,612 W Power Consumption 13,340 W
16.8 J/TH Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 50 dB
14.9 kg Weight 37.0 kg
12,324 BTU/hr BTU Output 45,516 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 44/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Daily Revenue 0.00009894 BTC $7.83
Daily Electricity -$8.67
Daily Profit -$0.84
Monthly -$25.15
Yearly -$306.03

MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

Daily Revenue 0.00042337 BTC $33.51
Daily Electricity -$32.02
Daily Profit $1.49
Monthly $44.72
Yearly $544.09

Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 328% more hashrate (215 vs 920 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79's favour. The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T and MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 328% more hashrate (215 vs 920 TH/s)
  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 73% better power draw (3,612 vs 13,340 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 14% better efficiency (16.8 vs 14.5 J/TH)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 60% better weight (14.9 vs 37.0 kg)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 269% more heat output (12,324 vs 45,516 BTU/hr)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 47% more home mining score (30.0 vs 44.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

$2.33/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T or MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 is more profitable at $1.49/day compared to $-0.84/day for the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79: which runs at a lower noise level?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T or MicroBT WhatsMiner M79?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T and MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 on J/TH?

The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T runs at 16.8 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 2.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficiency (16.8 vs 14.5 J/TH).