Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T vs Canaan Avalon Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T | Specification | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| 218.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 90.0 TH/s |
| 3,662 W | Power Consumption | 1,674 W |
| 16.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 10.5 kg |
| 12,495 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,712 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T
Canaan Avalon Q
Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 142% more hashrate (218.0 vs 90.0 TH/s). That said, the Canaan Avalon Q isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T and Canaan Avalon Q diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 142% more hashrate (218.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Q 54% better power draw (3,662 vs 1,674 W)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 10% better efficiency (16.8 vs 18.6 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Q 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Q 30% better weight (14.9 vs 10.5 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 119% more heat output (12,495 vs 5,712 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Q 87% more home mining score (30.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T | Metric | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| $2,525 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,292 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.74 |
| -$2,838 | Net after 1 year | -$1,563 |
| -$3,151 | Net after 2 years | -$1,834 |
| -$3,463 | Net after 3 years | -$2,105 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon QScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T or Canaan Avalon Q more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-0.74/day compared to $-0.86/day for the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T vs Canaan Avalon Q: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T or Canaan Avalon Q?
The Canaan Avalon Q scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T and Canaan Avalon Q on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T runs at 16.8 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH — a difference of 1.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficiency (16.8 vs 18.6 J/TH).