Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T vs Whatsminer M63S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T | Specification | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| 218.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 390.0 TH/s |
| 3,662 W | Power Consumption | 7,215 W |
| 16.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 28.0 kg |
| 12,495 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,618 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T
Whatsminer M63S
Based on BTC price of $79,423 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 49% better power draw (3,662 vs 7,215 W). The Whatsminer M63S holds the edge in hashrate and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T and Whatsminer M63S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M63S 79% more hashrate (218 vs 390 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 49% better power draw (3,662 vs 7,215 W)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 9% better efficiency (16.8 vs 18.5 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63S 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 47% better weight (14.9 vs 28.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M63S 97% more heat output (12,495 vs 24,618 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63S 47% more home mining score (30.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T | Metric | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| $2,525 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$0.82 | Daily net profit | -$3.06 |
| -$2,825 | Net after 1 year | -$13,118 |
| -$3,124 | Net after 2 years | -$14,235 |
| -$3,424 | Net after 3 years | -$15,353 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T or the Whatsminer M63S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T is more profitable at $-0.82/day compared to $-3.06/day for the Whatsminer M63S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T or the Whatsminer M63S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M63S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T or Whatsminer M63S?
The Whatsminer M63S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T and Whatsminer M63S?
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T runs at 16.8 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63S runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 1.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficiency (16.8 vs 18.5 J/TH).