MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M63S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 390.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Power Consumption | 7,215 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 8,550.0 kg | Weight | 28.0 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,618 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Whatsminer M63S
Based on BTC price of $79,202 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M63S, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1082% more hashrate (33.0 vs 390.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M63S sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M63S 1082% more hashrate (33.0 vs 390.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 70% better power draw (2,145 vs 7,215 W)
- Whatsminer M63S 72% better efficiency (65.0 vs 18.5 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63S 100% better weight (8,550.0 vs 28.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M63S 236% more heat output (7,319 vs 24,618 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63S 69% more home mining score (26.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$3.91 | Daily net profit | -$2.66 |
| -$3,926 | Net after 1 year | -$12,970 |
| -$5,353 | Net after 2 years | -$13,940 |
| -$6,779 | Net after 3 years | -$14,910 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M63S18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M63S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M63S is more profitable at $-2.66/day compared to $-3.91/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or Whatsminer M63S?
The Whatsminer M63S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M63S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M63S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M63S on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63S runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 46.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficiency (65.0 vs 18.5 J/TH).