Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S

Hashrate 6.0 TH/s Power 140 W Efficiency 23.3 J/TH
VS
NerdAxe

NerdAxe

Hashrate 500.0 GH/s Power 12 W Efficiency 24.0 J/TH

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs NerdAxe

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S Specification NerdAxe
6.0 TH/s Hashrate 500.0 GH/s
140 W Power Consumption 12 W
23.3 J/TH Efficiency 24.0 J/TH
30 dB Noise Level 30 dB
0.9 kg Weight 0.2 kg
478 BTU/hr BTU Output 41 BTU/hr
65/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S

Daily Revenue 0.00000276 BTC $0.22
Daily Electricity -$0.34
Daily Profit -$0.12
Monthly -$3.53
Yearly -$42.97

NerdAxe

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.03
Daily Profit -$0.01
Monthly -$0.32
Yearly -$3.87

Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1100% more hashrate (6.0 vs 0.5 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S's favour. That said, the NerdAxe isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Canaan Avalon Nano 3S — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S and NerdAxe diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 1100% more hashrate (6.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • NerdAxe 91% better power draw (140.0 vs 12.0 W)
  • Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 3% better efficiency (23.3 vs 24.0 J/TH)
  • NerdAxe 77% better weight (0.9 vs 0.2 kg)
  • Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 1068% more heat output (477.7 vs 40.9 BTU/hr)
  • NerdAxe 8% more home mining score (65.0 vs 70.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S Metric NerdAxe
$145 Upfront cost (MSRP) $69
-$0.12 Daily net profit -$0.01
-$188 Net after 1 year -$73
-$231 Net after 2 years -$77
-$274 Net after 3 years -$81
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

NerdAxe

Score: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S

23.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S or the NerdAxe?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdAxe is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-0.12/day for the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs NerdAxe: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs NerdAxe: which fits a residential setup better?

The NerdAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs NerdAxe: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S runs at 23.3 J/TH while the NerdAxe runs at 24.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficiency (23.3 vs 24.0 J/TH).