Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs NerdAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | NerdAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 500.0 GH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 12 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 24.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 30 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 0.2 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 41 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
NerdAxe
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the NerdAxe wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 12.0 W). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and NerdAxe sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 2700% more hashrate (14.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- NerdAxe 99% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 12.0 W)
- NerdAxe 75% better efficiency (96.4 vs 24.0 J/TH)
- NerdAxe 45% better noise (55.0 vs 30.0 dB)
- NerdAxe 97% better weight (6.0 vs 0.2 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 11162% more heat output (4,606.2 vs 40.9 BTU/hr)
- NerdAxe 19% more home mining score (59.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | NerdAxe |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $69 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$0.01 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$73 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$77 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$81 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdAxe24.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs NerdAxe: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdAxe is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the NerdAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs NerdAxe: which fits a residential setup better?
The NerdAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs NerdAxe: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the NerdAxe runs at 24.0 J/TH — a difference of 72.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficiency (96.4 vs 24.0 J/TH).