Canaan AvalonMiner 741 vs Whatsminer M50S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner 741 | Specification | Whatsminer M50S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 138.0 TH/s |
| 1,150 W | Power Consumption | 3,276 W |
| 157.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,300.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 3,924 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner 741
Whatsminer M50S+
Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Whatsminer M50S+ wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 1790% more hashrate (7.3 vs 138.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 741 holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan AvalonMiner 741 and Whatsminer M50S+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M50S+ 1790% more hashrate (7.3 vs 138.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 741 65% better power draw (1,150 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 85% better efficiency (157.5 vs 23.7 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 100% better weight (4,300.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 185% more heat output (3,924 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 16% more home mining score (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner 741 | Metric | Whatsminer M50S+ |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,500 |
| -$2.49 | Daily net profit | -$2.84 |
| -$910 | Net after 1 year | -$4,537 |
| -$1,821 | Net after 2 years | -$5,574 |
| -$2,731 | Net after 3 years | -$6,611 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50S+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S+23.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 or Whatsminer M50S+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 is more profitable at $-2.49/day compared to $-2.84/day for the Whatsminer M50S+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 or the Whatsminer M50S+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M50S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 or Whatsminer M50S+?
The Whatsminer M50S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 741). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 and Whatsminer M50S+ on J/TH?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 741 runs at 157.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S+ runs at 23.7 J/TH — a difference of 133.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (157.5 vs 23.7 J/TH).