Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

GMO miner B3

GMO miner B3

Hashrate 33.0 TH/s Power 3,417 W Efficiency 103.6 J/TH
VS
StrongU STU-U8

StrongU STU-U8

Hashrate 46.0 TH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 45.7 J/TH

GMO miner B3 vs StrongU STU-U8

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

GMO miner B3 Specification StrongU STU-U8
33.0 TH/s Hashrate 46.0 TH/s
3,417 W Power Consumption 2,100 W
103.6 J/TH Efficiency 45.7 J/TH
Noise Level
5,000.0 kg Weight 8,200.0 kg
11,659 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
GMO miner Manufacturer StrongU

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

GMO miner B3

Daily Revenue 0.00001519 BTC $1.20
Daily Electricity -$8.20
Daily Profit -$7.00
Monthly -$210.00
Yearly -$2,554.95

StrongU STU-U8

Daily Revenue 0.00002117 BTC $1.67
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$3.37
Monthly -$100.98
Yearly -$1,228.57

Based on BTC price of $79,082 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the StrongU STU-U8 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 56% better efficiency (103.6 vs 45.7 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: StrongU STU-U8 — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the GMO miner B3 and StrongU STU-U8 sit on each measurable spec:

  • StrongU STU-U8 39% more hashrate (33.0 vs 46.0 TH/s)
  • StrongU STU-U8 39% better power draw (3,417 vs 2,100 W)
  • StrongU STU-U8 56% better efficiency (103.6 vs 45.7 J/TH)
  • GMO miner B3 39% better weight (5,000 vs 8,200 kg)
  • GMO miner B3 63% more heat output (11,659 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
  • StrongU STU-U8 18% more home mining score (22.0 vs 26.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

StrongU STU-U8

Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

StrongU STU-U8

45.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

GMO miner B3 vs StrongU STU-U8: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StrongU STU-U8 is more profitable at $-3.37/day compared to $-7.00/day for the GMO miner B3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the GMO miner B3 or StrongU STU-U8?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the GMO miner B3 or StrongU STU-U8?

The StrongU STU-U8 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the GMO miner B3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the GMO miner B3 and StrongU STU-U8 on J/TH?

The GMO miner B3 runs at 103.6 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U8 runs at 45.7 J/TH — a difference of 57.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficiency (103.6 vs 45.7 J/TH).