Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs GMO miner B3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | GMO miner B3 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 33.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 3,417 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 103.6 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 5,000.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,659 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | GMO miner |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
GMO miner B3
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9), which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 60% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,417 W). That said, the GMO miner B3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and GMO miner B3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- GMO miner B3 136% more hashrate (14.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 60% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,417 W)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 7% better efficiency (96.4 vs 103.6 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 100% better weight (6.0 vs 5,000.0 kg)
- GMO miner B3 153% more heat output (4,606 vs 11,659 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 168% more home mining score (59.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | GMO miner B3 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$7.03 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$2,352 | Net after 2 years | -$5,134 |
| -$3,354 | Net after 3 years | -$7,701 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)96.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs GMO miner B3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-7.03/day for the GMO miner B3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs GMO miner B3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the GMO miner B3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the GMO miner B3?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the GMO miner B3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and GMO miner B3?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the GMO miner B3 runs at 103.6 J/TH — a difference of 7.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (96.4 vs 103.6 J/TH).