Baikal BK-D vs Baikal Miner Cube
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-D | Specification | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| 320.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 300.0 MH/s |
| 1,100 W | Power Consumption | 90 W |
| 3,437.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,500.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-D
Baikal Miner Cube
Based on BTC price of $77,954 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Baikal BK-D edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 106567% more hashrate (0.3 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Baikal BK-D's favour. The Baikal Miner Cube claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Baikal BK-D and Baikal Miner Cube sit on each measurable spec:
- Baikal BK-D 106567% more hashrate (0.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Miner Cube 92% better power draw (1,100.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Baikal BK-D 99% better efficiency (3,438 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Baikal BK-D 1122% more heat output (3,753 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Miner Cube 16% more home mining score (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Baikal BK-D | Metric | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$2.63 | Daily net profit | -$0.22 |
| -$959 | Net after 1 year | -$1,079 |
| -$1,919 | Net after 2 years | -$1,158 |
| -$2,878 | Net after 3 years | -$1,236 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Miner CubeScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-D3,437.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-D or Baikal Miner Cube more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Miner Cube is more profitable at $-0.22/day compared to $-2.63/day for the Baikal BK-D. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Baikal BK-D vs Baikal Miner Cube: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-D or the Baikal Miner Cube?
The Baikal Miner Cube scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Baikal BK-D). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-D and Baikal Miner Cube?
The Baikal BK-D runs at 3,437.5 J/TH while the Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 296,562.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (3,438 vs 300,000 J/TH).