Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Baikal BK-D

Baikal BK-D

Hashrate 320.0 GH/s Power 1,100 W Efficiency 3,437.5 J/TH
VS
Baikal Mini Miner

Baikal Mini Miner

Hashrate 150.0 MH/s Power 50 W Efficiency 333,333.3 J/TH

Baikal BK-D vs Baikal Mini Miner

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-D Specification Baikal Mini Miner
320.0 GH/s Hashrate 150.0 MH/s
1,100 W Power Consumption 50 W
3,437.5 J/TH Efficiency 333,333.3 J/TH
Noise Level
6,500.0 kg Weight 475.0 kg
3,753 BTU/hr BTU Output 171 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 38/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithm X11
Baikal Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-D

Daily Revenue 0.00000015 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$2.64
Daily Profit -$2.63
Monthly -$78.85
Yearly -$959.39

Baikal Mini Miner

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.12
Daily Profit -$0.12
Monthly -$3.60
Yearly -$43.80

Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Baikal BK-D comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 213233% more hashrate (0.3 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal Mini Miner claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Baikal BK-D — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-D and Baikal Mini Miner actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Baikal BK-D 213233% more hashrate (0.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal Mini Miner 95% better power draw (1,100.0 vs 50.0 W)
  • Baikal BK-D 99% better efficiency (3,438 vs 333,333 J/TH)
  • Baikal Mini Miner 93% better weight (6,500 vs 475 kg)
  • Baikal BK-D 2100% more heat output (3,753 vs 171 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal Mini Miner 23% more home mining score (31.0 vs 38.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Baikal BK-D Metric Baikal Mini Miner
Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,000
-$2.63 Daily net profit -$0.12
-$959 Net after 1 year -$1,044
-$1,919 Net after 2 years -$1,088
-$2,878 Net after 3 years -$1,131
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal Mini Miner

Score: 38/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-D

3,437.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Baikal BK-D or Baikal Mini Miner more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Mini Miner is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-2.63/day for the Baikal BK-D. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-D or Baikal Mini Miner?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-D or the Baikal Mini Miner?

The Baikal Mini Miner scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Baikal BK-D). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Baikal BK-D and Baikal Mini Miner on J/TH?

The Baikal BK-D runs at 3,437.5 J/TH while the Baikal Mini Miner runs at 333,333.3 J/TH — a difference of 329,895.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (3,438 vs 333,333 J/TH).