Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Baikal BK-B

Baikal BK-B

Hashrate 160.0 GH/s Power 410 W Efficiency 2,562.5 J/TH
VS
Baikal Mini Miner

Baikal Mini Miner

Hashrate 150.0 MH/s Power 50 W Efficiency 333,333.3 J/TH

Baikal BK-B vs Baikal Mini Miner

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-B Specification Baikal Mini Miner
160.0 GH/s Hashrate 150.0 MH/s
410 W Power Consumption 50 W
2,562.5 J/TH Efficiency 333,333.3 J/TH
Noise Level
3,800.0 kg Weight 475.0 kg
1,399 BTU/hr BTU Output 171 BTU/hr
34/100 Home Mining Score 38/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithm X11
Baikal Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-B

Daily Revenue 0.00000007 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.98
Daily Profit -$0.98
Monthly -$29.35
Yearly -$357.06

Baikal Mini Miner

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.12
Daily Profit -$0.12
Monthly -$3.60
Yearly -$43.80

Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Baikal BK-B edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 106567% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Baikal BK-B's favour. That said, the Baikal Mini Miner isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Baikal BK-B — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-B and Baikal Mini Miner actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Baikal BK-B 106567% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal Mini Miner 88% better power draw (410.0 vs 50.0 W)
  • Baikal BK-B 99% better efficiency (2,563 vs 333,333 J/TH)
  • Baikal Mini Miner 88% better weight (3,800 vs 475 kg)
  • Baikal BK-B 720% more heat output (1,399 vs 171 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal Mini Miner 12% more home mining score (34.0 vs 38.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Baikal BK-B Metric Baikal Mini Miner
Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,000
-$0.98 Daily net profit -$0.12
-$357 Net after 1 year -$1,044
-$714 Net after 2 years -$1,088
-$1,071 Net after 3 years -$1,131
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal Mini Miner

Score: 38/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-B

2,562.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Baikal BK-B or Baikal Mini Miner more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Mini Miner is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-0.98/day for the Baikal BK-B. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-B or Baikal Mini Miner?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-B or the Baikal Mini Miner?

The Baikal Mini Miner scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Baikal BK-B). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Baikal BK-B and Baikal Mini Miner on J/TH?

The Baikal BK-B runs at 2,562.5 J/TH while the Baikal Mini Miner runs at 333,333.3 J/TH — a difference of 330,770.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (2,563 vs 333,333 J/TH).