Baikal BK-G28 vs StrongU STU-U6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-G28 | Specification | StrongU STU-U6 |
|---|---|---|
| 28.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 440.0 GH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 2,200 W |
| 46,428.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 5,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,550.0 kg | Weight | 7,200.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-G28
StrongU STU-U6
Based on BTC price of $74,032 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the StrongU STU-U6 offers 89% better efficiency at 5,000.0 J/TH compared to the Baikal BK-G28 at 46,428.6 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-G28Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
StrongU STU-U65,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-G28 or StrongU STU-U6 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-G28 is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-5.27/day for the StrongU STU-U6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-G28 or StrongU STU-U6?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-G28 or StrongU STU-U6?
The Baikal BK-G28 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the StrongU STU-U6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-G28 and StrongU STU-U6?
The Baikal BK-G28 runs at 46,428.6 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U6 runs at 5,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 41,428.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.