iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink BM-S1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K3 | Specification | iBeLink BM-S1 |
|---|---|---|
| 70.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.8 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 2,350 W |
| 47.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 345.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 9,000.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,018 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K3
iBeLink BM-S1
Based on BTC price of $74,273 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the iBeLink BM-K3 offers 86% better efficiency at 47.1 J/TH compared to the iBeLink BM-S1 at 345.6 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S1Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K347.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-K3 or iBeLink BM-S1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S1 is more profitable at $-5.42/day compared to $-5.67/day for the iBeLink BM-K3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-K3 or iBeLink BM-S1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K3 or iBeLink BM-S1?
The iBeLink BM-S1 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K3 and iBeLink BM-S1?
The iBeLink BM-K3 runs at 47.1 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S1 runs at 345.6 J/TH — a difference of 298.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.