Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iBeLink BM-N1

iBeLink BM-N1

Hashrate 6.6 TH/s Power 2,400 W Efficiency 363.6 J/TH
VS
iBeLink BM-S1

iBeLink BM-S1

Hashrate 6.8 TH/s Power 2,350 W Efficiency 345.6 J/TH

iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink BM-S1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-N1 Specification iBeLink BM-S1
6.6 TH/s Hashrate 6.8 TH/s
2,400 W Power Consumption 2,350 W
363.6 J/TH Efficiency 345.6 J/TH
Noise Level
9,900.0 kg Weight 9,000.0 kg
8,189 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,018 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm Blake2b-sia
iBeLink Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-N1

Daily Revenue 0.00000304 BTC $0.23
Daily Electricity -$5.76
Daily Profit -$5.53
Monthly -$165.79
Yearly -$2,017.14

iBeLink BM-S1

Daily Revenue 0.00000313 BTC $0.24
Daily Electricity -$5.64
Daily Profit -$5.40
Monthly -$161.98
Yearly -$1,970.76

Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-S1 edges it: 3 of 3 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Its biggest concrete edge: 5% better efficiency (364 vs 346 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iBeLink BM-S1 — wins on 3 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink BM-S1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iBeLink BM-S1 3% more hashrate (6.6 vs 6.8 TH/s)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 2% better power draw (2,400 vs 2,350 W)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 5% better efficiency (364 vs 346 J/TH)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 9% better weight (9,900 vs 9,000 kg)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 2% more heat output (8,189 vs 8,018 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iBeLink BM-N1 Metric iBeLink BM-S1
Upfront cost (MSRP) $768
-$5.53 Daily net profit -$5.40
-$2,017 Net after 1 year -$2,739
-$4,034 Net after 2 years -$4,710
-$6,051 Net after 3 years -$6,680
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink BM-S1

345.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-N1 or the iBeLink BM-S1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S1 is more profitable at $-5.40/day compared to $-5.53/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-N1 or iBeLink BM-S1?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink BM-S1: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink BM-S1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S1 runs at 345.6 J/TH — a difference of 18.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficiency (364 vs 346 J/TH).