Goldshell CK Box II vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK Box II | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.8 TH/s |
| 400 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| 190.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 1,365 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK Box II
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption). Its biggest concrete edge: 26% better power draw (400 vs 295 W). The Goldshell CK Box II holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK Box II and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK Box II 17% more hashrate (2.1 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 26% better power draw (400 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 14% better efficiency (190 vs 164 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 28% better weight (3.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell CK Box II 36% more heat output (1,365 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell CK Box II | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $246 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$0.88 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$569 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$892 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$1,214 | Net after 3 years | -$942 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)163.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell CK Box II or iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) is more profitable at $-0.64/day compared to $-0.88/day for the Goldshell CK Box II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK Box II or iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell CK Box II or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Goldshell CK Box II vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell CK Box II runs at 190.5 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 26.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficiency (190 vs 164 J/TH).