iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N1 | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.8 TH/s |
| 2,400 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| 363.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,900.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 8,189 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N1
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 88% better power draw (2,400 vs 295 W). That said, the iBeLink BM-N1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-N1 267% more hashrate (6.6 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 88% better power draw (2,400 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 55% better efficiency (364 vs 164 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 100% better weight (9,900.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N1 714% more heat output (8,189 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 31% more home mining score (26.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-N1 | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$5.52 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$2,016 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$4,031 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$6,047 | Net after 3 years | -$942 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)163.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) is more profitable at $-0.64/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-N1 or iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N1 or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 199.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficiency (364 vs 164 J/TH).