Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Elphapex DG 1+

Elphapex DG 1+

Hashrate 14.0 GH/s Power 3,920 W Efficiency 280,000.0 J/TH
VS
Elphapex DG 2

Elphapex DG 2

Hashrate 20.0 GH/s Power 3,800 W Efficiency 190,000.0 J/TH

Elphapex DG 1+ vs Elphapex DG 2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Elphapex DG 1+ Specification Elphapex DG 2
14.0 GH/s Hashrate 20.0 GH/s
3,920 W Power Consumption 3,800 W
280,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 190,000.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
18.3 kg Weight 18.3 kg
13,375 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,966 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm Scrypt
Elphapex Manufacturer Elphapex

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Elphapex DG 1+

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$9.41
Daily Profit -$9.41
Monthly -$282.22
Yearly -$3,433.74

Elphapex DG 2

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$9.12
Daily Profit -$9.12
Monthly -$273.58
Yearly -$3,328.54

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Elphapex DG 2 wins on 3 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). The standout gap is 32% better efficiency (280,000 vs 190,000 J/TH) in the Elphapex DG 2's favour. That said, the Elphapex DG 1+ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Elphapex DG 2 — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Elphapex DG 1+ and Elphapex DG 2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Elphapex DG 2 43% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Elphapex DG 2 3% better power draw (3,920 vs 3,800 W)
  • Elphapex DG 2 32% better efficiency (280,000 vs 190,000 J/TH)
  • Elphapex DG 1+ 3% more heat output (13,375 vs 12,966 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Elphapex DG 1+ Metric Elphapex DG 2
$1,452 Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,680
-$9.41 Daily net profit -$9.12
-$4,885 Net after 1 year -$8,009
-$8,319 Net after 2 years -$11,337
-$11,753 Net after 3 years -$14,666
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Elphapex DG 2

190,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Elphapex DG 1+ or Elphapex DG 2 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Elphapex DG 2 is more profitable at $-9.12/day compared to $-9.41/day for the Elphapex DG 1+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Elphapex DG 1+ or the Elphapex DG 2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Elphapex DG 1+ vs Elphapex DG 2: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Elphapex DG 1+ and Elphapex DG 2 on J/TH?

The Elphapex DG 1+ runs at 280,000.0 J/TH while the Elphapex DG 2 runs at 190,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 90,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficiency (280,000 vs 190,000 J/TH).