Ebang Ebit E9.3

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 1,760 W Efficiency 110.0 J/TH

Innosilicon T3 39T

Hashrate 39.0 TH/s Power 2,150 W Efficiency 55.1 J/TH

Ebang Ebit E9.3 vs Innosilicon T3 39T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Ebang Ebit E9.3	Specification	Innosilicon T3 39T
16.0 TH/s	Hashrate	39.0 TH/s
1,760 W	Power Consumption	2,150 W
110.0 J/TH	Efficiency	55.1 J/TH
—	Noise Level	—
6,900.0 kg	Weight	8,650.0 kg
6,005 BTU/hr	BTU Output	7,336 BTU/hr
28/100	Home Mining Score	26/100
—	Release Year	—
SHA-256	Algorithm	SHA-256
Ebang	Manufacturer	Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

Electricity Rate:

$/kWh

Ebang Ebit E9.3

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58

Daily Electricity -$4.22

Daily Profit -$3.64

Monthly -$109.25

Yearly -$1,329.23

Innosilicon T3 39T

Daily Revenue 0.00001795 BTC $1.42

Daily Electricity -$5.16

Daily Profit -$3.74

Monthly -$112.22

Yearly -$1,365.36

Based on BTC price of $79,082 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon T3 39T comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 144% more hashrate (16.0 vs 39.0 TH/s). That said, the Ebang Ebit E9.3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Innosilicon T3 39T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Ebang Ebit E9.3 and Innosilicon T3 39T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

Innosilicon T3 39T 144% more hashrate (16.0 vs 39.0 TH/s)
Ebang Ebit E9.3 18% better power draw (1,760 vs 2,150 W)
Innosilicon T3 39T 50% better efficiency (110.0 vs 55.1 J/TH)
Ebang Ebit E9.3 20% better weight (6,900 vs 8,650 kg)
Innosilicon T3 39T 22% more heat output (6,005 vs 7,336 BTU/hr)
Ebang Ebit E9.3 8% more home mining score (28.0 vs 26.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Ebang Ebit E9.3

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3 39T

55.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ebang Ebit E9.3 vs Innosilicon T3 39T: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E9.3 is more profitable at $-3.64/day compared to $-3.74/day for the Innosilicon T3 39T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Ebang Ebit E9.3 or the Innosilicon T3 39T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Ebang Ebit E9.3 or the Innosilicon T3 39T?

The Ebang Ebit E9.3 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T3 39T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Ebang Ebit E9.3 vs Innosilicon T3 39T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Ebang Ebit E9.3 runs at 110.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 39T runs at 55.1 J/TH — a difference of 54.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficiency (110.0 vs 55.1 J/TH).

Compare Ebang Ebit E9.3 with...

Compare Innosilicon T3 39T with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. ASIC Repair 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.