IceRiver AL0 vs IceRiver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver AL0 | Specification | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 GH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 10 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver AL0
IceRiver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the IceRiver KS0, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 650 J/TH). The IceRiver AL0 claws back ground on noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver AL0 and IceRiver KS0 sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS0 24900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 35% better power draw (100.0 vs 65.0 W)
- IceRiver KS0 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 650 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 71% better noise (10.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 54% more heat output (341 vs 222 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver AL0 | Metric | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$287 | Net after 1 year | -$155 |
| -$374 | Net after 2 years | -$210 |
| -$462 | Net after 3 years | -$266 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS0650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver AL0 or the IceRiver KS0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-0.24/day for the IceRiver AL0. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver AL0 or the IceRiver KS0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the IceRiver KS0 at 35 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver AL0 or the IceRiver KS0?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver AL0 and IceRiver KS0?
The IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 249,350.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 650 J/TH).