IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver AL0 | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 10 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver AL0
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KS2, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 499900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The IceRiver AL0 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver AL0 and Iceriver KS2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS2 499900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 92% better power draw (100 vs 1,200 W)
- Iceriver KS2 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 87% better noise (10.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver KS2 1100% more heat output (341 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 58% more home mining score (71.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver AL0 | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$287 | Net after 1 year | -$1,424 |
| -$374 | Net after 2 years | -$2,449 |
| -$462 | Net after 3 years | -$3,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS2600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver AL0 or the Iceriver KS2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-2.81/day for the Iceriver KS2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KS2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver KS2 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver AL0 or the Iceriver KS2?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 45/100 for the Iceriver KS2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver AL0 and Iceriver KS2 on J/TH?
The IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 249,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 600 J/TH).