IceRiver AL0 vs Dragonball Miner A40
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver AL0 | Specification | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 3.3 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 1,600 W |
| 250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 484.9 J/TH |
| 10 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,459 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 42/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver AL0
Dragonball Miner A40
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Dragonball Miner A40 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 824900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.3 TH/s) in the Dragonball Miner A40's favour. The IceRiver AL0 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver AL0 and Dragonball Miner A40 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Dragonball Miner A40 824900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.3 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 94% better power draw (100 vs 1,600 W)
- Dragonball Miner A40 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 485 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 87% better noise (10.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball Miner A40 1500% more heat output (341 vs 5,459 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 69% more home mining score (71.0 vs 42.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver AL0 | Metric | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,400 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$3.72 |
| -$287 | Net after 1 year | -$4,758 |
| -$374 | Net after 2 years | -$6,116 |
| -$462 | Net after 3 years | -$7,475 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball Miner A40484.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver AL0 or the Dragonball Miner A40?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-3.72/day for the Dragonball Miner A40. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver AL0 or Dragonball Miner A40?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Dragonball Miner A40 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver AL0 or Dragonball Miner A40?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 42/100 for the Dragonball Miner A40). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver AL0 and Dragonball Miner A40 on J/TH?
The IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner A40 runs at 484.9 J/TH — a difference of 249,515.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 485 J/TH).