IceRiver KS3 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3 | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 11.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,600 W |
| 400.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 327.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3
Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 38% more hashrate (8.0 vs 11.0 TH/s) in the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus's favour. The IceRiver KS3 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS3 and Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus sit on each measurable spec:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 38% more hashrate (8.0 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3 11% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 18% better efficiency (400 vs 327 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3 1% better weight (14.4 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 13% more heat output (10,918 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS3 | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,294 |
| -$7.39 | Daily net profit | -$8.24 |
| -$12,698 | Net after 1 year | -$10,303 |
| -$15,396 | Net after 2 years | -$13,312 |
| -$18,095 | Net after 3 years | -$16,322 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS3 or the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-8.24/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3 or the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS3 or Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus?
The IceRiver KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS3 and Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus?
The IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus runs at 327.3 J/TH — a difference of 72.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 18% better efficiency (400 vs 327 J/TH).