Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | IceRiver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
IceRiver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver AL3 wins on 3 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 88% more hashrate (15.0 vs 8.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver AL3's favour. That said, the IceRiver KS3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver AL3 88% more hashrate (15.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3 9% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver AL3 42% better efficiency (233 vs 400 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3 10% better weight (16.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 9% more heat output (11,942 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | IceRiver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $10,000 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$12,698 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$15,396 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$18,095 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS3?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS3?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS3?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 166.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficiency (233 vs 400 J/TH).