Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 10.5 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 3,600 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 5150% more hashrate (0.2 vs 10.5 TH/s) in the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)'s favour. The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) sit on each measurable spec:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 5150% more hashrate (0.2 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 31% better efficiency (500 vs 343 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 3500% more heat output (341 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$164 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$249 | Net after 2 years | -$11,572 |
| -$334 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 ProScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)342.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro or the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 157.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficiency (500 vs 343 J/TH).