Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 200.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 7400% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.2 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver AL3 7400% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (3,500 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver AL3 53% better efficiency (233 vs 500 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 84% better weight (16.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 3400% more heat output (11,942 vs 341 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$164 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$249 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$334 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AL3 or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
The Iceriver AL3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro on J/TH?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 266.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficiency (233 vs 500 J/TH).