Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Dragonball Miner KS6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Specification | Dragonball Miner KS6 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 11.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 309.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Dragonball Miner KS6
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W). That said, the Dragonball Miner KS6 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Dragonball Miner KS6 sit on each measurable spec:
- Dragonball Miner KS6 2650% more hashrate (0.4 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 19% better efficiency (250 vs 309 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball Miner KS6 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% more home mining score (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Metric | Dragonball Miner KS6 |
|---|---|---|
| $77 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,820 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$7.76 |
| -$159 | Net after 1 year | -$6,654 |
| -$242 | Net after 2 years | -$9,488 |
| -$324 | Net after 3 years | -$12,322 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or Dragonball Miner KS6 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.76/day for the Dragonball Miner KS6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Dragonball Miner KS6: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Dragonball Miner KS6 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or Dragonball Miner KS6?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Dragonball Miner KS6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Dragonball Miner KS6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner KS6 runs at 309.1 J/TH — a difference of 59.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 19% better efficiency (250 vs 309 J/TH).