Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 GH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 250 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 55456% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 92% better power draw (1,300 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 42% better noise (60.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 84% better weight (15.5 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 1200% more heat output (4,436 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 37% more home mining score (52.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver AE2 720Mh at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,805,305.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 250 J/TH).